State Flower: Flower
Updates in 2023:
HF722/SF1982 [LS/LS] Conservation reserve program state incentives; includes soil health in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) incentives – see HF2310/SF2438, below
HF1316/SF1245 [LS/LS] Soil health financial assistance program establishment – see HF2278/SF1955 [LS/LS], below
HF1828/SF1983 [LS/LS] Water and soil conservation provisions modified; includes Soil Health Practices Program – see HF2310/SF2438 [LS/LS], below
HF1999/SF1682 [LS/LS] Legacy finance and policy bill; “$6,039,000 the first year and $6,038,000 the second year are for financial and technical assistance to enhance adoption of cover crops and other soil health practices to achieve water quality or drinking water benefits…” – enacted 5/19/2023
HF2278/SF1955 [LS/LS] Omnibus agriculture finance and policy bill; includes Soil Health Financial Assistance Program and “$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for the soil health financial assistance program” – Senate version enacted 5/18/2023
HF3018/SF2958 [LS/LS] Property assessed clean energy program modifications; includes soil health in commercial PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) loan program – see SF2542 [LS], below
-> SF2542 [LS] Omnibus Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate policy bill; includes soil health in commercial PACE loan program – see HF2310/SF2438 [LS/LS], below
-> HF2310/SF2438 [LS/LS] Omnibus environment, natural resources, climate, and energy finance and policy bill; includes:
- [103F.06] Soil Health Practices Program;
- “$10,557,000 the first year and $10,557,000 the second year are for soil health activities to achieve water quality, soil productivity, climate change resiliency, or carbon sequestration benefits consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 103F.06”;
- “$203,000 the first year and $203,000 the second year are for soil health practice adoption purposes consistent with the cost-sharing provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 103C.501, and for soil health program responsibilities in consultation with the University of Minnesota Office for Soil Health”;
- “$3,000,000 the first year is to provide onetime state incentive payments to enrollees in the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) during the continuous enrollment period and to enroll complementary areas in conservation easements consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 103F.515. The board may establish payment rates based on land valuation and on environmental benefit criteria, including but not limited to surface water or groundwater pollution reduction, drinking water protection, soil health, pollinator and wildlife habitat, and other conservation enhancements”;
- [103F.519] Working Lands Program, which includes land’s potential for improving soil health in selecting land for the program; and
- soil health added to commercial PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) loan program
– enacted 5/18/2023
HF2602/SF2584 [LS/LS] Clean Transportation Standard Act establishment and appropriation; includes “allow an additional credit premium of five percent for cropland-derived biofuels produced on acreage utilizing soil-healthy farming practices and fertilizer best management practices” – in committee at adjournment
HF3292 [LS] Soil-healthy farming mentorship grant program established, funding provided for grants promoting soil health practices, and money appropriated – in committee at adjournment
HF3293 [LS] Soil-healthy farming goals set for the state of Minnesota – in committee at adjournment
Updates in 2022:
SF3020/HF2719 [LS/LS], Conservation reserve program state incentive funding; “$5,000,000 in fiscal year 2023 … to provide onetime state incentive payments to enrollees in the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) … board may establish payment rates based on land valuation and on environmental benefit criteria, including but not limited to surface water or groundwater pollution reduction, drinking water protection, soil health, pollinator and wildlife habitat, and other conservation enhancements” – see HF3765 [LS], below
SF2811 [LS], Statewide soil health action plan appropriation; Statewide Soil Health Action Plan, includes appropriation “$150,000 … for soil health action plan” – see HF3302 [LS], below
HF2083 [LS], Transportation fuel carbon intensity reduction standards established; “aims to support, through credit generation or other financial means, voluntary farmer-led efforts to adopt agricultural practices that benefit soil health and water quality while contributing to lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from clean fuel feedstocks” – stalled in committee
HF3302 [LS], Soil health funding provided, and money appropriated; Soil Health Cost-Share Program and Statewide Soil Health Action Plan; includes appropriations “$17,000,000 in fiscal year 2023 … to accelerate the adoption of soil health practices … in fiscal year 2024 and thereafter is $4,500,000” and “$180,000 … for soil health action plan” – stalled in committee
SF4019/HF4366 [LS/LS], Agriculture provisions modifications and appropriations; creates Soil Health Cost-Share Program and Soil Health Financial Assistance Program; includes appropriations “$10,000,000 … for the soil health financial assistance program… in fiscal year 2024 and thereafter is $1,000,000” and “$17,000,000 in fiscal year 2023 … to accelerate the adoption of soil health practices … in fiscal year 2024 and thereafter is $4,500,000” – see HF3420 [LS], below
SF1580/HF1332 [LS/LS], Headwaters community food and water economic resiliency program – stalled in committee
HF2468 [LS], Climate resiliency program funding – stalled in committee
HF3420 [LS], includes establishment of Soil Health Financial Assistance Program with $500,000 funding – signed by Governor 5/26/2022
HF3765 [LS], appropriations, includes “$750,000 … to provide onetime state incentive payments to enrollees in the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) … The board may establish payment rates based on land valuation and on environmental benefit criteria, including but not limited to surface water or groundwater pollution reduction, drinking water protection, soil health, pollinator and wildlife habitat, and other conservation enhancements. The board may use state funds to implement the program and to provide technical assistance to landowners or their agents to fulfill enrollment and contract provisions.” – signed by Governor 6/3/2022
Updates in 2021:
HF701/SF1113, Soil-health farming goals, incentives, data collection and data privacy; soil-healthy farming program
HF936/SF1036, Soil health cost-sharing program
HF1010/SF793, Soil health action plan, precision agriculture research and outreach, agricultural best management practice loan program
Legislative Information
Date:
Introduced February 2021
Pending 100% – Soil Healthy Farming Bill
Legislation:
Sponsors:
- Rep. Todd Lippert (DFL – Northfield) + 24 co-sponsors
- Sen. Kent Eken (DFL – Twin Valley) + 4 co-sponsors
Agencies Involved:
Rule Making Processes:
No rule making needed, but implementation decisions will need to be made by assigned agencies
Program Summary
Description:
This is a comprehensive soil health bill that provides all the resources Minnesota farmers need to scale up soil- and resiliency-building practices and achieve 100% Soil-Healthy Farming in Minnesota. The bill provides motivating and accessible up-front grants and up to five years of direct payments to ensure soil-healthy practices are profitable from day one. It sets the following state-wide, voluntary goals:
- 50% of Minnesota farmers to implement soil-healthy practices by 2030
- 100% of Minnesota farmers to implement soil-healthy practices by 2035
- 100% of grazable and tillable acres implementing soil-healthy practices by 2040
The bill advances racial, economic, gender, and disability justice by prioritizing Black, brown, and Indigenous farmers, women farmers, farmers with disabilities and prioritizing grants and direct payments based on farm size.
Finally, there is a provision to collect data
Soil Health Definitions:
Already in MN law: “Soil health” means the continued capacity of soil to function as a vital living system that sustains plants, animals, and humans.
Indicators of soil health include water infiltration capacity; organic matter content; water holding capacity; biological capacity to break down plant residue and other substances and
Stated Goals:
To increase farm income, build soil health, prevent or minimize erosion and runoff, retain and clean water, increase vegetation on the landscape, sequester carbon, and foster healthier rural residents and pollinators and other wildlife.
Program Required Measurements:
As soil science is emerging, the funding does not depend on results, however there is a provision to collect data to deepen understanding of how specific practices impact soil health in different soil profiles across the state.
Tools & Guidance:
N/A
Funding Sources
Founding Source/s:
General Fund through Board of Water and Soil Resources
Funding Type/s:
Combination of up-front grants to kick-start new practices and up to five years of direct payments to sustain such practices.
Practices Eligible for Funding:
Managed rotational grazing, perennial cropping, cover cropping, interseeding, roller-crimping, no-till, organic.
Lessons Learned
- Working within a split legislature is challenging. While the bill ultimately did not pass the legislature, favorable budget negotiations in the House resulted in allocation of $5.35 million to get more soil-healthy practices onto the landscape. However, the compromise goal of 30% of farmland employing soil-healthy practices by 2030 was not included in the final budget and policy bill.
- Organizers engaged in a large outreach effort (all taking place during the pandemic), holding virtual listening sessions as well as small group and one-on-one sessions. Over 600 stakeholders were involved and heavily influenced the bill language, which was written by the Land Stewardship Project (LSP) together with the legislative champion.
- Being able to engage with people virtually turned out to be really powerful, especially having farmers testify from their farm, sometimes showing the farm in the background. Minnesota is a big geographic state –when stakeholders don’t have to travel the process becomes more inclusive and accessible. In the future, it would be good to be able to engage stakeholders both virtually and in person.
- While this is a brand new bill for Minnesota, we learned a lot from other efforts in the US, e.g. Maryland and other cost-share programs. We called it an ”aggressive state-level CSP” in order to communicate that this program is additive to the federal Conservation Stewardship Program. It is needed because 75% of farmers eligible for federal conservation funding get turned away. Up front costs to implement soil health practices are real!
- It’s important to talk to allies ahead of time, especially around the racial justice piece. While LSP has a mostly white membership, we worked with Voices for Racial Justice, Latino Economic Development Center and others to figure out how to prioritize funding the people that need it most: BIPOC, and women as well as small-and midsize farmers. We called it rural economic justice and emphasized that farms are small businesses that need to be supported.
- Those that are most impacted make the most effective spokespeople! Testimony from farmers that are struggling to get started with soil health practices –e.g. young farmers that don’t have the upfront capital– can be more powerful than a farmer that has been implementing soil health for years.
- When introducing a bill, start with the biggest, bold vision and then negotiate what’s possible. Start with collaborative tactics, but don’t shy away from respectful confrontation when necessary. Grassroots organizing is essential in providing the necessary push to reach a daring goal –we even knocked on doors in pivotal districts. It was fun!
- Next steps: the Board of Water and Soil Resources will need time to develop a soil health program and build an application. They want to do it well and ensure that it is successful. The program will probably be funneled through the Soil and Water Conservation Districts. Organizers are continuing to meet with stakeholders and the board to support a successful implementation and ensure that racial justice is actualized.
- Funding allocations of $5.35 million for two years (budget years July 2021-June 2023) is a great start but not even close to the scale of what is needed. Solutions need to be at the same scale as the challenge of climate change!
- 2022 is not a budget year in Minnesota, organizers will keep working on policy and goal setting. Minnesota’s entire house, senate and governor are up for election in 2022.
Legislative Committees
House Committee: N/a
Senate Committee: N/a
State Universities & Researchers
University of Minnesota
Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture
Agricultural Organizations & Technical Assistance
Education & Advocacy Groups
Supporting organizations:
Austin (Chapter 10) of the Izaak Walton League of America
Cannon River Watershed Partnership
Central Minnesota Young Farmers Coalition
Clean Up our River Environment
The Food Group / Big River Farms
Friends of Minnesota Scientific and Natural Areas
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness
Friends of the Mississippi River
Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate
Hmong American Farmers Association
Humane Society of the United States
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
Izaak Walton League of America
Latino Economic Development Center
Main Street Alliance of Minnesota
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
Minnesota Environmental Partnership
Minnesota Interfaith Power & Light
Minnesota River Valley Audubon Chapter
Minnesota Well Owners Organization
Media & Additional Resources
The Story Behind LSP’s Soil Health & Climate Campaign, LSP blog June 24, 2021
University of Minnesota Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Initiative: Developed and disseminated pertinent information about biological carbon sequestration in ecosystems in Minnesota. It provided a forum for academic, government, and general audiences on a range of ecological, economic, and institutional issues. The goal of the Initiative was to identify, test, and build support for carbon management strategies that benefit rural economies, regional environments, and the climate. (Land-grant university)
- The Potential for Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration in Minnesota: A Report to the Department of Natural Resources from the Minnesota Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Initiative
Date:
- Introduced June 14, 2021
- Signed by Governor Walz on June 29, 2021
Legislation:
SF0020, Omnibus environment and natural resources policy and finance bill, includes funding for soil health program
Editor’s Note: When summarizing state Healthy Soils legislation, legislation that changes the state statutes has been tracked. Many state legislatures enact measures that do not change the statutes, most frequently in relation to the state budgets. State statutes tend to be a visible anchor for measures, giving those measures more reliable permanence. Without that anchor, measures may lose funding or support as legislative memory fades and administrations change.
The Healthy Soils legislation last year in Minnesota was particularly hard to sort through, as there were roughly twenty different bills related somehow to the original Healthy Soils bills filed at the beginning of the session. The legislation that passed that included soil health were funding bills (SF0020, Omnibus environment and natural resources policy and finance bill, and HF0013, Omnibus legacy finance bill), which did not put soil health in the statutes. SF0020 implicitly created a soil health program with initial and ongoing funding:
(k) $675,000 the first year and $675,000 the second year are for soil health practice adoption purposes consistent with the cost-sharing provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 103C.501, and for soil health program responsibilities in consultation with the University of Minnesota Office for Soil Health. The base for this appropriation in fiscal year 2024 and beyond is $203,000.
The passage of state Healthy Soils legislation is important, particularly in creating state soil health programs, yet funding is crucial for those programs to be implemented and successful. Updating the state statutes and improving funding for soil health programs are both important. Some states that have passed Healthy Soils legislation still need to provide initial or ongoing funding for the programs created by legislation. The Minnesota legislation, while not changing the statutes, has provided initial and ongoing funding.
Contact the Land Stewardship Project policy team at Minnesota@healthysoilspolicy.org